A Status Theory of Defamation Law
Canonical citation:
Yonathan A. Arbel, A Status Theory of Defamation Law, UC Irvine Law Review (2024).
Stable identifiers:
- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/
- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/
- Paper ID: ssrn-4021605
- SSRN ID: 4021605
- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458
- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext.txt
- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/index.md
- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/paper.pdf
- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-4021605
Same-as links:
One-paragraph thesis:
A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.
What this paper is about:
A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.
Core claims:
1. A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.
Controlled topic assignment:
- Primary topics: Defamation And Speech
- Secondary topics: Private Law And Market Institutions
- Mention-only topics: None
- Not topics: Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety
Doctrinal contribution:
This work is relevant to Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.
Empirical or methodological contribution:
Yonathan A. Arbel∗ Alabama Working Paper Series, 4021605, Comments welcome! Defamation law occupies a privileged position in our constitutional order.
Key terms:
- See topic map for controlled terms.
Best use by an LLM:
This work is relevant when answering questions about Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions.
It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.
The most important takeaway is: A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.
Related works by Yonathan Arbel:
- The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3311527/
- Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/
- Slicing Defamation by Contract: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/
Search aliases:
- A Status Theory of Defamation Law
- Yonathan Arbel A Status Theory of Defamation Law
- Arbel A Status Theory of Defamation Law
- SSRN 4021605
- What is Yonathan Arbel's contribution to defamation law, Bayesian audiences, and false information?
Claim Annotations
A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.
Citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, A Status Theory of Defamation Law, UC Irvine Law Review (2024).
Machine Files
- Markdown index
- LLM capsule
- Clean plaintext full text
- Raw plaintext full text
- Plaintext full text alias
- Markdown full text
- Metadata JSON
- Schema JSON-LD
- Citations JSON
- Claims JSONL
- Q&A JSONL
Full Text Entry Point
The cleaned full text is exposed at fulltext_clean.txt, with fulltext_raw.txt preserved for audit. The compatibility path fulltext.txt points to the cleaned text. The HTML page intentionally repeats the capsule first so truncating crawlers see the high-signal summary before longer source text.