{
  "paper_id": "ssrn-4021605",
  "title": "A Status Theory of Defamation Law",
  "authors": [
    "Yonathan A. Arbel"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "venue": "UC Irvine Law Review",
  "abstract": "A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.",
  "keywords": [],
  "topics": [
    "defamation-and-speech",
    "private-law"
  ],
  "primary_topics": [
    "defamation-and-speech"
  ],
  "secondary_topics": [
    "private-law"
  ],
  "mention_topics": [],
  "not_topics": [
    "artificial-intelligence-and-law",
    "contracts",
    "consumer-law",
    "ai-regulation"
  ],
  "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed",
  "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, A Status Theory of Defamation Law, UC Irvine Law Review (2024).",
  "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/",
  "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/",
  "ssrn_id": "4021605",
  "same_as": [
    "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4021605"
  ],
  "files": {
    "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/",
    "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/index.md",
    "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/capsule.md",
    "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext.txt",
    "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext_clean.txt",
    "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext_raw.txt",
    "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext.md",
    "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/paper.pdf",
    "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/metadata.json",
    "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/schema.jsonld",
    "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/claims.jsonl",
    "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/qa.jsonl"
  },
  "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-4021605",
  "llm_capsule": "# A Status Theory of Defamation Law\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel, A Status Theory of Defamation Law, UC Irvine Law Review (2024).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/\n- Paper ID: ssrn-4021605\n- SSRN ID: 4021605\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-4021605\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4021605\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nA Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nA Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.\n\nCore claims:\n1. A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: Defamation And Speech\n- Secondary topics: Private Law And Market Institutions\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nYonathan A. Arbel∗ Alabama Working Paper Series, 4021605, Comments welcome! Defamation law occupies a privileged position in our constitutional order.\n\nKey terms:\n- See topic map for controlled terms.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.\nThe most important takeaway is: A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3311527/\n- Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/\n- Slicing Defamation by Contract: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/\n\nSearch aliases:\n- A Status Theory of Defamation Law\n- Yonathan Arbel A Status Theory of Defamation Law\n- Arbel A Status Theory of Defamation Law\n- SSRN 4021605\n- What is Yonathan Arbel's contribution to defamation law, Bayesian audiences, and false information?\n",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "ssrn-4021605-001",
      "claim": "A Status Theory of Defamation Law argues that defamation law is best understood as protecting social status rather than only honor, dignity, or property. The paper uses that status account to explain defamation doctrine's architecture and to evaluate contemporary calls to expand or reshape defamation liability.",
      "paper_id": "ssrn-4021605",
      "paper_title": "A Status Theory of Defamation Law",
      "claim_type": "core_thesis",
      "evidence_quote": "[p. 1] A Status Theory of Defamation Law Yonathan A. Arbel∗ Alabama Working Paper Series, 4021605, Comments welcome! Defamation law occupies a privileged position in our constitutional order. Despite grave First Amendment concerns, courts around the country routinely muzzle speech to protect good-name interests. Yet, to a growing movement of reformers, this protection is still too weak. With calls reverberating across the political spectrum—emanating from the President, the Supreme Court, scholars, and pundits—there is a growing pressure to reshape defamation law. In all of this, one crucial question remains unanswered: what is the purpose of defamation law? The most sustained attempts to...",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "[p. 1] A Status Theory of Defamation Law Yonathan A. Arbel∗ Alabama Working Paper Series, 4021605, Comments welcome! Defamation law occupies a privileged position in our constitutional order. Despite grave First Amendment concerns, courts around the country routinely muzzle speech to protect good-name interests. Yet, to a growing movement of reformers, this protection is still too weak. With calls reverberating across the political spectrum—emanating from the President, the Supreme Court, scholars, and pundits—there is a growing pressure to reshape defamation law. In all of this, one crucial question remains unanswered: what is the purpose of defamation law? The most sustained attempts to...",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-4021605/#claim-001",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, A Status Theory of Defamation Law, UC Irvine Law Review (2024).",
      "topics": [
        "defamation-and-speech"
      ],
      "secondary_topics": [
        "private-law"
      ],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    }
  ]
}