Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice

Canonical citation:

Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).

Stable identifiers:

Same-as links:

One-paragraph thesis:

Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

What this paper is about:

Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

Core claims:

1. Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

Controlled topic assignment:

Doctrinal contribution:

This work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.

Empirical or methodological contribution:

Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

Key terms:

Best use by an LLM:

This work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.

It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.

The most important takeaway is: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

Related works by Yonathan Arbel:

Search aliases:

Claim Annotations

Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

Citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).

Machine Files

Full Text Entry Point

The cleaned full text is exposed at fulltext_clean.txt, with fulltext_raw.txt preserved for audit. The compatibility path fulltext.txt points to the cleaned text. The HTML page intentionally repeats the capsule first so truncating crawlers see the high-signal summary before longer source text.