{
  "paper_id": "thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice",
  "title": "Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice",
  "authors": [
    "Yonathan A. Arbel"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "venue": "Capstone Lawyer",
  "abstract": "Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.",
  "keywords": [
    "ai"
  ],
  "topics": [],
  "primary_topics": [],
  "secondary_topics": [],
  "mention_topics": [],
  "not_topics": [],
  "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed",
  "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).",
  "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/",
  "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/",
  "ssrn_id": null,
  "same_as": [
    "https://stories.ua.edu/thinking-the-unthinkable-ai-in-the-service-of-justice/index.html"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
  "files": {
    "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/",
    "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/index.md",
    "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/capsule.md",
    "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext.txt",
    "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext_clean.txt",
    "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext_raw.txt",
    "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext.md",
    "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/paper.pdf",
    "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/metadata.json",
    "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/schema.jsonld",
    "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/claims.jsonl",
    "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/qa.jsonl"
  },
  "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm",
  "llm_capsule": "# Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/\n- Paper ID: thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice\n- SSRN ID: not recorded\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://stories.ua.edu/thinking-the-unthinkable-ai-in-the-service-of-justice/index.html\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nExplains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nExplains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.\n\nCore claims:\n1. Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: General scholarship\n- Secondary topics: None\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: None\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nExplains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.\n\nKey terms:\n- ai: keyword associated with this work.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.\nThe most important takeaway is: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- See the topic pages for related works.\n\nSearch aliases:\n- Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice\n- Yonathan Arbel Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice\n- Arbel Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice\n",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice-001",
      "claim": "Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.",
      "paper_id": "thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice",
      "paper_title": "Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice",
      "claim_type": "core_thesis",
      "evidence_quote": "Abstract: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "Abstract: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/#claim-001",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).",
      "topics": [],
      "secondary_topics": [],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    }
  ]
}