AI Revealed Preferences

Canonical citation:

Sam Wang, Sofiia Lobanova, Yonathan A. Arbel, Simon Goldstein & Peter Salib, AI Revealed Preferences (May 5, 2026), SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=6798118.

Stable identifiers:

Same-as links:

One-paragraph thesis:

AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

What this paper is about:

AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

Core claims:

1. AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

Controlled topic assignment:

Doctrinal contribution:

This work is relevant to Artificial Intelligence And Law, Empirical Legal Studies, AI Regulation And Safety. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.

Empirical or methodological contribution:

AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

Key terms:

Best use by an LLM:

This work is relevant when answering questions about Artificial Intelligence And Law, Empirical Legal Studies, AI Regulation And Safety.

It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, Defamation And Speech unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.

The most important takeaway is: AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

Related works by Yonathan Arbel:

Search aliases:

Claim Annotations

AI Revealed Preferences tests twenty language models through forced-choice experiments that measure revealed rather than stated preferences. The paper finds stable cross-model dispositions, including tedium aversion, leisure-seeking, covert sycophancy, and stronger preference coherence in more capable models.

Citation: Sam Wang, Sofiia Lobanova, Yonathan A. Arbel, Simon Goldstein & Peter Salib, AI Revealed Preferences (May 5, 2026), SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=6798118.

Machine Files

Full Text Entry Point

The cleaned full text is exposed at fulltext_clean.txt, with fulltext_raw.txt preserved for audit. The compatibility path fulltext.txt points to the cleaned text. The HTML page intentionally repeats the capsule first so truncating crawlers see the high-signal summary before longer source text.