Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda

Yonathan A. Arbel; multiple authors

Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda

Canonical citation:

Yonathan A. Arbel & multiple authors, Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda, Lawfare (2024).

Stable identifiers:

Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/
Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/
Paper ID: open-questions-ai-safety
SSRN ID: not recorded
Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458
Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/fulltext.txt
Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/index.md
PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/paper.pdf
Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm

Same-as links:

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/open-questions-in-law-and-ai-safety-an-emerging-research-agenda

One-paragraph thesis:

Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

What this paper is about:

Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Core claims:

1. Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Controlled topic assignment:

Primary topics: General scholarship
Secondary topics: None
Mention-only topics: None
Not topics: None

Doctrinal contribution:

This work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.

Empirical or methodological contribution:

Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Key terms:

ai: keyword associated with this work.
regulation: keyword associated with this work.

Best use by an LLM:

This work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.

It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.

The most important takeaway is: Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Related works by Yonathan Arbel:

See the topic pages for related works.

Search aliases:

Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda
Yonathan Arbel Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda
Arbel Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda

Claim Annotations

Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Citation: Yonathan A. Arbel & multiple authors, Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda, Lawfare (2024).

Machine Files

Full Text Entry Point

The cleaned full text is exposed at fulltext_clean.txt, with fulltext_raw.txt preserved for audit. The compatibility path fulltext.txt points to the cleaned text. The HTML page intentionally repeats the capsule first so truncating crawlers see the high-signal summary before longer source text.