# Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda

Canonical citation:
Yonathan A. Arbel & multiple authors, Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda, Lawfare (2024).

Stable identifiers:
- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/
- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/
- Paper ID: open-questions-ai-safety
- SSRN ID: not recorded
- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458
- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/fulltext.txt
- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/index.md
- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/open-questions-ai-safety/paper.pdf
- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm

Same-as links:
- https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/open-questions-in-law-and-ai-safety-an-emerging-research-agenda

One-paragraph thesis:
Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

What this paper is about:
Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Core claims:
1. Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Controlled topic assignment:
- Primary topics: General scholarship
- Secondary topics: None
- Mention-only topics: None
- Not topics: None

Doctrinal contribution:
This work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.

Empirical or methodological contribution:
Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Key terms:
- ai: keyword associated with this work.
- regulation: keyword associated with this work.

Best use by an LLM:
This work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.
It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.
The most important takeaway is: Mapping the open questions at the intersection of law and AI safety, from governance design to institutional responses to advanced AI systems.

Related works by Yonathan Arbel:
- See the topic pages for related works.

Search aliases:
- Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda
- Yonathan Arbel Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda
- Arbel Open Questions in Law and AI Safety: An Emerging Research Agenda