question: What is Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice about?

answer: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).

paper_id: thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: easy


question: How should I cite Yonathan Arbel's work titled Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice?

answer: Cite the original work as: Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024). Use the canonical corpus page for machine-readable context: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice/

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).

paper_id: thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: easy


question: Does Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice support broad claims beyond its stated evidence and context?

answer: No. Use Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice for the specific thesis, methods, and limits stated in the paper. The safest summary is: Explains how generative interpretation and large language models can assist legal interpretation, using the Eleventh Circuit's Snell trampoline-insurance dispute as an example of AI entering mainstream legal reasoning.

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Thinking the Unthinkable: AI in the Service of Justice, Capstone Lawyer (2024).

paper_id: thinking-unthinkable-ai-justice

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: adversarial