{
  "paper_id": "ssrn-3452662",
  "title": "Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences",
  "authors": [
    "Yonathan A. Arbel",
    "Murat C. Mungan"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "venue": "Journal of Legal Studies",
  "abstract": "Information regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.",
  "keywords": [
    "contracts"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "defamation-and-speech",
    "private-law"
  ],
  "primary_topics": [
    "defamation-and-speech"
  ],
  "secondary_topics": [
    "private-law"
  ],
  "mention_topics": [],
  "not_topics": [
    "artificial-intelligence-and-law",
    "contracts",
    "consumer-law",
    "ai-regulation"
  ],
  "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed",
  "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel & Murat C. Mungan, Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences, Journal of Legal Studies (2020).",
  "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/",
  "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/",
  "ssrn_id": "3452662",
  "same_as": [
    "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3452662"
  ],
  "files": {
    "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/",
    "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/index.md",
    "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/capsule.md",
    "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext.txt",
    "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext_clean.txt",
    "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext_raw.txt",
    "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext.md",
    "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/paper.pdf",
    "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/metadata.json",
    "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/schema.jsonld",
    "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/claims.jsonl",
    "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/qa.jsonl"
  },
  "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-3452662",
  "llm_capsule": "# Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel & Murat C. Mungan, Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences, Journal of Legal Studies (2020).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/\n- Paper ID: ssrn-3452662\n- SSRN ID: 3452662\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-3452662\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3452662\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nInformation regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nInformation regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.\n\nCore claims:\n1. Information regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.\n2. The common approach to regulating information exchange has a significant blind spot: it often fails to account for the dynamic ways in which audiences adapt. Specifically, how audiences adjust their beliefs and subsequent actions is directly influenced by the perceived strictness of the laws that govern the truthfulness of statements. This oversight can lead to miscalibrated regulations.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: Defamation And Speech\n- Secondary topics: Private Law And Market Institutions\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nInformation regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.\n\nKey terms:\n- contracts: keyword associated with this work.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Defamation And Speech, Private Law And Market Institutions.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Artificial Intelligence And Law, Contracts And Remedies, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.\nThe most important takeaway is: Information regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3311527/\n\nSearch aliases:\n- Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences\n- Yonathan Arbel Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences\n- Arbel Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences\n- SSRN 3452662\n- What is Yonathan Arbel's contribution to defamation law, Bayesian audiences, and false information?\n",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "ssrn-3452662-001",
      "claim": "Information regulation often overlooks how audiences adjust their beliefs and actions based on the strictness of laws governing statement veracity. His research aims to address this \"audience gap\" by using a Bayesian game to model interactions between speakers, targets, and audiences, particularly examining how legal strictness impacts their behavior and the resulting information landscape.",
      "paper_id": "ssrn-3452662",
      "paper_title": "Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences",
      "claim_type": "core_thesis",
      "evidence_quote": "public(Heymann, 2012). Whateverthereason,regulationoftheinformationenvironment—theflowand qualityofinformationtothepublic—affectsaudiencesandtheirbeliefsquite directly. Ourobjecthereistobridgetheaudiencegapbyformalizingtheinteraction betweenspeakers,thetargetsoftheirspeech,andmembersoftheaudience.We employatoolthatisnaturallyaptatanalyzingthisissue,namely,aBayesian game,andweinvestigatetheimpactofthestrictnessofthelawontheemergingPerfectBayesianEquilibria(PBE).Underthisframework,aspeaker,who has private information about a business or individual (“target”), may make Draft,Vol.0,No.0, doi:/ewmxxx (cid:13)c . Allrightsreserved.ForPermissions,pleaseemail: 2 .V0N0 claims about the target to an...",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "public(Heymann, 2012). Whateverthereason,regulationoftheinformationenvironment—theflowand qualityofinformationtothepublic—affectsaudiencesandtheirbeliefsquite directly. Ourobjecthereistobridgetheaudiencegapbyformalizingtheinteraction betweenspeakers,thetargetsoftheirspeech,andmembersoftheaudience.We employatoolthatisnaturallyaptatanalyzingthisissue,namely,aBayesian game,andweinvestigatetheimpactofthestrictnessofthelawontheemergingPerfectBayesianEquilibria(PBE).Underthisframework,aspeaker,who has private information about a business or individual (“target”), may make Draft,Vol.0,No.0, doi:/ewmxxx (cid:13)c . Allrightsreserved.ForPermissions,pleaseemail: 2 .V0N0 claims about the target to an...",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/#claim-001",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel & Murat C. Mungan, Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences, Journal of Legal Studies (2020).",
      "topics": [
        "defamation-and-speech"
      ],
      "secondary_topics": [
        "private-law"
      ],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "ssrn-3452662-002",
      "claim": "The common approach to regulating information exchange has a significant blind spot: it often fails to account for the dynamic ways in which audiences adapt. Specifically, how audiences adjust their beliefs and subsequent actions is directly influenced by the perceived strictness of the laws that govern the truthfulness of statements. This oversight can lead to miscalibrated regulations.",
      "paper_id": "ssrn-3452662",
      "paper_title": "Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences",
      "claim_type": "supporting_claim",
      "evidence_quote": "ulstatements.Whencourtsarelesscapableof accuratelyadjudicatingstatements,thesocialcostofusingthecourtsystem— operationalizedbylitigationcosts—iskeyindeterminingwhetherinformation shouldberegulated.Eveninthesecases,whenthegainsfromfacilitatingbeneficialinteractionsanddeterringharmfulonesdwarfslitigationcosts,moderate damagesemergeastheoptimalchoice.2 Anotherimplicationpertainstothepotentialdynamicimpactofinformation regulating laws. Specifically, moderate laws that cause the audience to rationally rely on speakers’ statements broadens the gap between the frequency withwhichtheaudienceinteractswithgoodtypesversusbadtypes.Thisnaturally increases the returns from being a good versus a bad...",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "ulstatements.Whencourtsarelesscapableof accuratelyadjudicatingstatements,thesocialcostofusingthecourtsystem— operationalizedbylitigationcosts—iskeyindeterminingwhetherinformation shouldberegulated.Eveninthesecases,whenthegainsfromfacilitatingbeneficialinteractionsanddeterringharmfulonesdwarfslitigationcosts,moderate damagesemergeastheoptimalchoice.2 Anotherimplicationpertainstothepotentialdynamicimpactofinformation regulating laws. Specifically, moderate laws that cause the audience to rationally rely on speakers’ statements broadens the gap between the frequency withwhichtheaudienceinteractswithgoodtypesversusbadtypes.Thisnaturally increases the returns from being a good versus a bad...",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/#claim-002",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel & Murat C. Mungan, Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences, Journal of Legal Studies (2020).",
      "topics": [
        "defamation-and-speech"
      ],
      "secondary_topics": [
        "private-law"
      ],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    }
  ]
}