{
  "paper_id": "ssrn-2820650",
  "title": "Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts",
  "authors": [
    "Yonathan A. Arbel"
  ],
  "year": "2016",
  "venue": "International Review of Law & Economics",
  "abstract": "The primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for else the debts can be collected from exposed assets. A wealthier debtor would thus need to shield more assets, and at a greater cost, than a debtor with limited wealth. Using this basic understanding, I develop a theory of asset shielding and explore its implications for incomplete lending contracts, explaining the role of equity agreements, equity cushions and collateral, and debt forgiveness, and explore the some of the policy implications. 1. INTRODUCTION The primary means of enforcement of civil legal liabilities, such as debt contracts, taxes, or tort judgments, is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, as Section 2 discusses, debtors are",
  "keywords": [
    "contracts"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "contracts",
    "private-law"
  ],
  "primary_topics": [
    "contracts",
    "private-law"
  ],
  "secondary_topics": [],
  "mention_topics": [],
  "not_topics": [
    "artificial-intelligence-and-law",
    "consumer-law",
    "defamation-and-speech",
    "ai-regulation"
  ],
  "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed",
  "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts, International Review of Law & Economics (2016).",
  "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/",
  "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/",
  "ssrn_id": "2820650",
  "same_as": [
    "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2820650"
  ],
  "files": {
    "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/",
    "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/index.md",
    "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/capsule.md",
    "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext.txt",
    "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext_clean.txt",
    "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext_raw.txt",
    "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext.md",
    "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/paper.pdf",
    "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/metadata.json",
    "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/schema.jsonld",
    "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/claims.jsonl",
    "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/qa.jsonl"
  },
  "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-2820650",
  "llm_capsule": "# Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel, Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts, International Review of Law & Economics (2016).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/\n- Paper ID: ssrn-2820650\n- SSRN ID: 2820650\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-2820650\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2820650\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nDebtor wealth dictates asset shielding decisions. His theory posits that wealthier debtors often find shielding large asset volumes too costly and thus irrational. Conversely, poorer debtors present a higher shielding risk. This dynamic, where shielding is more rational for poorer debtors, significantly influences credit markets.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nThe primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for else the debts can be collected from exposed assets. A wealthier debtor would thus need to shield more assets, and at a greater cost, than a debtor with limited wealth. Using this basic understanding, I develop a theory of asset shielding and explore its implications for incomplete lending contracts, explaining the role of equity agreements, equity cushions and collateral, and debt forgiveness, and explore the some of the policy implications. 1. INTRODUCTION The primary means of enforcement of civil legal liabilities, such as debt contracts, taxes, or tort judgments, is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, as Section 2 discusses, debtors are\n\nCore claims:\n1. The primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for...\n2. A debtor's wealth significantly influences their decision to shield assets, as wealthier individuals would need to shield a larger volume of assets at greater cost for it to be effective against creditors. his paper develops a theory of asset shielding to explain this behavior, arguing that richer debtors often find it irrational to shield, while poorer debtors pose a higher shielding risk which impacts credit markets.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions\n- Secondary topics: None\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: Artificial Intelligence And Law, Consumer Law And Contracting, Defamation And Speech, AI Regulation And Safety\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nDebtor wealth dictates asset shielding decisions. His theory posits that wealthier debtors often find shielding large asset volumes too costly and thus irrational. Conversely, poorer debtors present a higher shielding risk. This dynamic, where shielding is more rational for poorer debtors, significantly influences credit markets.\n\nKey terms:\n- contracts: keyword associated with this work.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Artificial Intelligence And Law, Consumer Law And Contracting, Defamation And Speech, AI Regulation And Safety unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.\nThe most important takeaway is: Debtor wealth dictates asset shielding decisions. His theory posits that wealthier debtors often find shielding large asset volumes too costly and thus irrational. Conversely, poorer debtors present a higher shielding risk. This dynamic, where shielding is more rational for poorer debtors, significantly influences credit markets.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- Contract Remedies in Action: Specific Performance: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-1641438/\n\nSearch aliases:\n- Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts\n- Yonathan Arbel Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts\n- Arbel Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts\n- SSRN 2820650\n- What is Yonathan Arbel's contribution to contract law, contract interpretation, remedies, and private ordering?\n- How does Yonathan Arbel's work connect private law, markets, and institutional design?\n",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "ssrn-2820650-001",
      "claim": "The primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for...",
      "paper_id": "ssrn-2820650",
      "paper_title": "Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts",
      "claim_type": "core_thesis",
      "evidence_quote": "Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts (Forthcoming, International Review of Law & Economics) Yonathan A. Arbel* ABSTRACT The primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for else the debts can be collected from exposed assets. A wealthier debtor would...",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts (Forthcoming, International Review of Law & Economics) Yonathan A. Arbel* ABSTRACT The primary means of enforcement of legal liabilities is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, debtors can shield their assets in various ways and thereby reduce the power of enforcement. This paper studies the circumstances under which a debtor would choose to shield assets and the value of assets that would be shielded. A key idea is that borrower’s wealth mutes shielding incentives. Intuitively, avoiding debts through shielding requires that enough assets will be shielded, for else the debts can be collected from exposed assets. A wealthier debtor would...",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/#claim-001",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts, International Review of Law & Economics (2016).",
      "topics": [
        "contracts",
        "private-law"
      ],
      "secondary_topics": [],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "ssrn-2820650-002",
      "claim": "A debtor's wealth significantly influences their decision to shield assets, as wealthier individuals would need to shield a larger volume of assets at greater cost for it to be effective against creditors. his paper develops a theory of asset shielding to explain this behavior, arguing that richer debtors often find it irrational to shield, while poorer debtors pose a higher shielding risk which impacts credit markets.",
      "paper_id": "ssrn-2820650",
      "paper_title": "Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts",
      "claim_type": "supporting_claim",
      "evidence_quote": "ete lending contracts, explaining the role of equity agreements, equity cushions and collateral, and debt forgiveness, and explore the some of the policy implications. 1. INTRODUCTION The primary means of enforcement of civil legal liabilities, such as debt contracts, taxes, or tort judgments, is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, as Section 2 discusses, debtors are often in a position to circumvent asset seizure by the use of such methods as hiding cash, transferring ownership of property to family members, and using shell corporations. After shielding, creditors will be dissuaded from collecting their debts and debtors may file for bankruptcy and discharge their...",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "ete lending contracts, explaining the role of equity agreements, equity cushions and collateral, and debt forgiveness, and explore the some of the policy implications. 1. INTRODUCTION The primary means of enforcement of civil legal liabilities, such as debt contracts, taxes, or tort judgments, is through the seizure of debtors’ assets. However, as Section 2 discusses, debtors are often in a position to circumvent asset seizure by the use of such methods as hiding cash, transferring ownership of property to family members, and using shell corporations. After shielding, creditors will be dissuaded from collecting their debts and debtors may file for bankruptcy and discharge their...",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/#claim-002",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts, International Review of Law & Economics (2016).",
      "topics": [
        "contracts",
        "private-law"
      ],
      "secondary_topics": [],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    }
  ]
}