question: What is The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation about?

answer: Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).

paper_id: false-choice-ai

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: easy


question: How should I cite Yonathan Arbel's work titled The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation?

answer: Cite the original work as: Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024). Use the canonical corpus page for machine-readable context: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/false-choice-ai/

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).

paper_id: false-choice-ai

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: easy


question: Does The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation support broad claims beyond its stated evidence and context?

answer: No. Use The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation for the specific thesis, methods, and limits stated in the paper. The safest summary is: Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

required_citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).

paper_id: false-choice-ai

topic: general-scholarship

difficulty: adversarial