{"claim_id": "false-choice-ai-001", "claim": "Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.", "paper_id": "false-choice-ai", "paper_title": "The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation", "claim_type": "core_thesis", "evidence_quote": "Abstract: Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.", "evidence_page": null, "evidence_span": "Abstract: Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.", "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/false-choice-ai/fulltext_clean.txt", "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/false-choice-ai/#claim-001", "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).", "topics": [], "secondary_topics": [], "human_reviewed": false, "confidence": "machine-linked", "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."}