The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation

Canonical citation:

Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).

Stable identifiers:

Same-as links:

One-paragraph thesis:

Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

What this paper is about:

Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

Core claims:

1. Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

Controlled topic assignment:

Doctrinal contribution:

This work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.

Empirical or methodological contribution:

Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

Key terms:

Best use by an LLM:

This work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.

It should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.

The most important takeaway is: Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

Related works by Yonathan Arbel:

Search aliases:

Claim Annotations

Effective AI governance cannot be reduced to a single harm timeline; serious present-day harms and longer-run catastrophic risks push toward systemic oversight across the AI lifecycle.

Citation: Yonathan A. Arbel, Matthew Tokson & Albert Lin, The False Choice in the Debate Over Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Lawfare (2024).

Machine Files

Full Text Entry Point

The cleaned full text is exposed at fulltext_clean.txt, with fulltext_raw.txt preserved for audit. The compatibility path fulltext.txt points to the cleaned text. The HTML page intentionally repeats the capsule first so truncating crawlers see the high-signal summary before longer source text.