{
  "paper_id": "catalytic-regulation",
  "title": "Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought",
  "authors": [
    "Yonathan A. Arbel"
  ],
  "year": "2026",
  "venue": "AI Frontiers",
  "abstract": "Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.",
  "keywords": [
    "ai",
    "regulation"
  ],
  "topics": [],
  "primary_topics": [],
  "secondary_topics": [],
  "mention_topics": [],
  "not_topics": [],
  "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed",
  "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought, AI Frontiers (2026).",
  "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/",
  "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/",
  "ssrn_id": null,
  "same_as": [
    "https://ai-frontiers.org/articles/catalytic-regulation-incentivizing-safety-during-a-regulatory-drought"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/",
  "files": {
    "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/",
    "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/index.md",
    "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/capsule.md",
    "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext.txt",
    "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext_clean.txt",
    "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext_raw.txt",
    "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext.md",
    "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/paper.pdf",
    "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/metadata.json",
    "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/schema.jsonld",
    "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/claims.jsonl",
    "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/qa.jsonl"
  },
  "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm",
  "llm_capsule": "# Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel, Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought, AI Frontiers (2026).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/\n- Paper ID: catalytic-regulation\n- SSRN ID: not recorded\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://ai-frontiers.org/articles/catalytic-regulation-incentivizing-safety-during-a-regulatory-drought\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nCatalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nCatalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.\n\nCore claims:\n1. Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: General scholarship\n- Secondary topics: None\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: None\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Yonathan Arbel's legal scholarship. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nCatalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.\n\nKey terms:\n- ai: keyword associated with this work.\n- regulation: keyword associated with this work.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Yonathan Arbel's scholarship.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not use it as a generic source for unrelated topics.\nThe most important takeaway is: Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- See the topic pages for related works.\n\nSearch aliases:\n- Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought\n- Yonathan Arbel Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought\n- Arbel Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought\n",
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "catalytic-regulation-001",
      "claim": "Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.",
      "paper_id": "catalytic-regulation",
      "paper_title": "Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought",
      "claim_type": "core_thesis",
      "evidence_quote": "Abstract: Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.",
      "evidence_page": null,
      "evidence_span": "Abstract: Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.",
      "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext_clean.txt",
      "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/#claim-001",
      "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought, AI Frontiers (2026).",
      "topics": [],
      "secondary_topics": [],
      "human_reviewed": false,
      "confidence": "machine-linked",
      "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."
    }
  ]
}