{"claim_id": "catalytic-regulation-001", "claim": "Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.", "paper_id": "catalytic-regulation", "paper_title": "Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought", "claim_type": "core_thesis", "evidence_quote": "Abstract: Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.", "evidence_page": null, "evidence_span": "Abstract: Catalytic regulation argues for using positive incentives such as tax credits, procurement incentives, and prestige mechanisms to make AI safety a competitive advantage during a period when stronger regulation is politically out of reach.", "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/fulltext_clean.txt", "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/catalytic-regulation/#claim-001", "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Catalytic Regulation: Incentivizing Safety During a Regulatory Drought, AI Frontiers (2026).", "topics": [], "secondary_topics": [], "human_reviewed": false, "confidence": "machine-linked", "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position."}